Venkki the talk about shbh/dhbh is which is more aesthetically pleasing to the eye!!. Nobody said DHBH is inferior.
1. 16 + Counting Grandslams
2. 237 Continous weeks as No 1;
3. 23 Consecutive Grandslam semifinals (2004 Wimbledon - 2010 Australian Open)
4. 92-5 Win loss in the year 2006; 12 Titles ; Talk about almost total domination.
5. 44+ titles in Hard courts; 2 shy of tying all time leader Agassi.
6. 65 consecutive grass court match victories (2003 - 2008)
7. 56 consecutive hard court match victories (2005–2006)
8. 22 Grandslam Finals.
9. Only Player to win ATP WTF undefeated 4 times (2003, 2004, 2006, 2010).
10. The biggest of all; 5 Consecutive Wimbledons+ 5 Consecutive US Opens (Somebody defeat this feat!!)
Venkki the talk about shbh/dhbh is which is more aesthetically pleasing to the eye!!. Nobody said DHBH is inferior.
Omega have u seen this before...
ajithfederer, I too agree SHBH is more aesthetically pleasing to the eye. And DHBH is more powerful and less aesthetically pleasing to the eye!Originally Posted by ajithfederer
சொல்லிச் சொல்லி ஆறாது சொன்னா துயர் தீராது...
Thank u
Let us go further. In aesthetic context, who is the winner ? Federer and Henin?
சொல்லிச் சொல்லி ஆறாது சொன்னா துயர் தீராது...
I give the edge to Henin!
சொல்லிச் சொல்லி ஆறாது சொன்னா துயர் தீராது...
thanks for doing that.
I'll never get this. Or for that matter, Graf, W Sisters, Seles, being brought up in to Men's domain, even for aesthetic purposes.
...an artist without an art.
Offcourse, I had watched the entire match live....
Yeah the famous toilet break (check the timing...:LOL
everything is fair in love and war and it is war.Offcourse, I had watched the entire match live....
Yeah the famous toilet break (check the timing...:LOL
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
Bookmarks