View Poll Results: Greatest Tennis Player of All Time

Voters
25. You may not vote on this poll
  • Steffi "Fraulein Forehand" Graf

    2 8.00%
  • Martina "Maltova" Navaratilova

    0 0%
  • Bjorn "Ice Man" Borg

    0 0%
  • Rod "Grand Slammer" Laver

    1 4.00%
  • Jimmy "Retriever Dog" Connors

    0 0%
  • John "Temparamental Artist" McEnroe

    1 4.00%
  • Pete "Wimbledon" Sampras

    8 32.00%
  • Roger "Former King" Federer

    9 36.00%
  • Rafael "Superman" Nadal

    4 16.00%
  • Andre Agassi

    0 0%
Page 3 of 6 FirstFirst 12345 ... LastLast
Results 21 to 30 of 51

Thread: Greatest Tennis Player of All Time - Rafael Nadal?

  1. #21

    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Posts
    110
    Post Thanks / Like
    Rafael "Superman" Nadal
    Roger "Former King" Federer
    Pete "Wimbledon" Sampras
    John "Temparamental Artist" McEnroe
    Jimmy "Retriever Dog" Connors
    Rod "Grand Slammer" Laver
    Bjorn "Ice Man" Borg
    Martina "Maltova" Navaratilova
    Steffi "Fraulein Forehand" Graf

    Let me put my thoughts

    Considering Women's section in isolation ( too much of power gap between men & women in Tennis ).
    I wud vote for Martina . Her overall record is stupendous. Be it singles or doubles, mixed doubles .

    Men's section :

    All the listed names are all time greats but they had their own share of shortcomings other than Rod Laver . They havent won a slam ( except Fed & Nadal ). Considering this (-)ative aspect, the final list is down to just 2 :

    Roger
    Rafa

    Both are role models & legends. As of now, Roger leads in terms of titles and qualifies by virtue of having won French open. However, I doubt whether he cud have won it last year if Rafa had been there across. His victories against Rafa have not been convincing ( thumping ) of late and he would have been a bunny @ last year's final.
    Now Nadal Having won US open too now, he definitely has to be held in the highest grade . He has beaten all the respective court specialists handsomely and bound to reach Fed's awesome slam records. I cud forsee atleast another 3 french open + 1 Wimbledon + 2 US + 3 Australian which will enable him to surpass Fed.
    So my conclusion is conclusive ( we should not talk about grace , charm etc here )

  2. # ADS
    Circuit advertisement
    Join Date
    Always
    Posts
    Many
     

  3. #22
    Senior Member Diamond Hubber kid-glove's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Posts
    4,851
    Post Thanks / Like
    Little premature to call him 'greatest tennis player of all time'. He doesn't seem to slow it down, but I'm predicting that he'll end with maximum of 5 GS (which is still 2 short of Fed's tally ATM), and will gradually lose his streak. Yes, I'll bookmark this post.
    ...an artist without an art.

  4. #23
    Senior Member Seasoned Hubber
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Posts
    1,327
    Post Thanks / Like
    Quote Originally Posted by Puliyan_Biryani
    Federer . For the sheer joy and awe he brought when he was in his peak.
    Enna sir past tensela pesureenga. Intha openla kooda joy kuduthaare (first round tweener/the underscoop finish against Melzer/showcasing soderling how to play with wind/pushing the 23 year old then no.3 (novak) even on his worst serving day).

    Kavalaye padaatheenga innum kuduppaar!!!!

  5. #24
    Senior Member Seasoned Hubber
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Posts
    1,410
    Post Thanks / Like
    Quote Originally Posted by kid-glove
    Little premature to call him 'greatest tennis player of all time'. He doesn't seem to slow it down, but I'm predicting that he'll end with maximum of 5 GS (which is still 2 short of Fed's tally ATM), and will gradually lose his streak. Yes, I'll bookmark this post.
    Well said kid-glove. When Fed got to 15 there was talk of 18 or even 20 by the time he hangs his boots. But it is very difficult to maintain that level of consistency and fitness. Especially for Nadal's game, fitness is the most important aspect and how he manages it would be crucial. Irrespective of your last shot, Nadal will always get there and make you hit one more shot. Another reason why I chose Fed over Nadal is it is incredible to have reached the QF/SF of all Slams over the last 6-7 years (to have such an injury-free run).

  6. #25
    Senior Member Seasoned Hubber
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Posts
    1,410
    Post Thanks / Like
    Quote Originally Posted by omega
    Quote Originally Posted by Puliyan_Biryani
    Federer . For the sheer joy and awe he brought when he was in his peak.
    Enna sir past tensela pesureenga. Intha openla kooda joy kuduthaare (first round tweener/the underscoop finish against Melzer/showcasing soderling how to play with wind/pushing the 23 year old then no.3 (novak) even on his worst serving day).

    Kavalaye padaatheenga innum kuduppaar!!!!
    naan solradhu absolute peek sir. During the 2003-2005 days when his racquet was compared with a magic wand. The flicks and passes were likened to beautiful paintings. The days when Roddick threw the kitchen sink at him but Roger brought his bathtub. Nowadays he does produce some moments of brilliance, but they are few and far between. Sometimes it is a bit irritating to watch him shank balls out of the court.

    Federer himself said that he has set his sights on London 2012 (to be played on grass ). Winning that and retiring would be great. Anything he acheives till that time is just a bonus

  7. #26

    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Posts
    110
    Post Thanks / Like
    Quote Originally Posted by kid-glove
    Little premature to call him 'greatest tennis player of all time'. He doesn't seem to slow it down, but I'm predicting that he'll end with maximum of 5 GS (which is still 2 short of Fed's tally ATM), and will gradually lose his streak. Yes, I'll bookmark this post.
    Hmm. You are rating Fed by sheer noof titles . 1 or 2 titles short doesnt make Nadal inferior or Fed superior. Arent you convinced that Nadal had beaten Fed on Wimbledon too @ his peak ? Fed cudnt do it in Rolland Garros

  8. #27
    Senior Member Seasoned Hubber
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Posts
    1,410
    Post Thanks / Like
    Quote Originally Posted by Waterloo
    Hmm. You are rating Fed by sheer noof titles . 1 or 2 titles short doesnt make Nadal inferior or Fed superior. Arent you convinced that Nadal had beaten Fed on Wimbledon too @ his peak ? Fed cudnt do it in Rolland Garros
    Just extending this above logic a bit further. 14 or 15 titles short doesn't make Nalbandian inferior or Nadal superior. Doesn't Nalbandian hold a 2-0 head to head advantage against Nadal? Why have we not included Nalbandian in the top ten

    Since when did we start picking greats just by looking at their H2H records. What shall we do for players of other era like Laver? IMHO the H2H stats itself are flawed. When Fed was in his peak, he consistently made the finals of all the tournaments (even in FO). Nadal at one point could only make it in FO and he had a great record beating him in FO. If Nadal had made the finals of other slams/tournaments and beaten Fed consistently then I would agree (maybe). By the time Nadal started making the finals of other slams, Fed was past his prime (IMO). It is inappropriate to come to a conclusion just on H2H.

  9. #28
    Vivasaayi's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Posts
    4,795
    Post Thanks / Like
    Quote Originally Posted by Puliyan_Biryani
    Quote Originally Posted by raajarasigan
    Quote Originally Posted by Vivasaayi
    indha michael chang michael chang nu oruthan irundhane...avana yarukavadhu pidikuma?

    one of my childhood favourites
    asappula Jackie chan'kku thambi maadhiri iruppan... Sampras peakla irundha timela semis varaikkum vandhu thotthuduvaar...
    Match beginning-la nallaa kOttai vittuduvaaru. appuram 2 sets down + 1 break down in the 3rd set maadhiri situation-la muzhichukittu bayangaramaa aadi win pannuvaaru
    enna oru energy...chumma kaal la sakkaratha katti vitta maadhiri parapaaan!

    pete..haayaaa parkla kaathu vangitu velayadradhu innoru vagai!
    OM NAMASIVAYA

  10. #29
    Senior Member Seasoned Hubber
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Posts
    3,005
    Post Thanks / Like
    sampras is my fav..he is the best
    Say My Name

  11. #30
    Senior Member Seasoned Hubber satissh_r's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    Chennai
    Posts
    1,595
    Post Thanks / Like
    Andre Agassiku inga supporters illaya?
    Patience, Forgiveness and Understanding are great tools for humanity...! Spread the Love - A R Rahman

Page 3 of 6 FirstFirst 12345 ... LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. Rafael Nadal
    By ajithfederer in forum Sports
    Replies: 160
    Last Post: 12th June 2017, 10:09 AM
  2. Who is greatest Villains of all time?
    By PARAMASHIVAN in forum Tamil Films
    Replies: 262
    Last Post: 5th March 2010, 07:09 PM
  3. The Greatest Philosopher of All time - Dr. Goundamani Ph.D
    By littlemaster1982 in forum Tamil Films
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 27th October 2008, 08:17 PM
  4. Replies: 18
    Last Post: 19th September 2005, 11:28 AM
  5. Who is the greatest hubber of all time?
    By dr# in forum Miscellaneous Topics
    Replies: 156
    Last Post: 24th May 2005, 07:08 AM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •