-
5th October 2010, 11:32 AM
#601
Senior Member
Veteran Hubber
Originally Posted by
Waterloo
Sachin has failed again !
What happened to your sunnyg, Nakeeran ID's?
-
5th October 2010 11:32 AM
# ADS
Circuit advertisement
-
5th October 2010, 12:11 PM
#602
Senior Member
Veteran Hubber
Sachin reached 1000 test runs for this year. This is the 6th time he has achieved this, which is a world record. Lara, Ponting have done it 5 times
another record!
"Sehwag is the most destructive modern cricketer, There is no doubt abt it. He is just so destructive. He is totally fearless"-Viv Richards
-
5th October 2010, 12:14 PM
#603
Originally Posted by
Sourav
Sachin reached 1000 test runs for this year. This is the 6th time he has achieved this, which is a world record. Lara, Ponting have done it 5 times
another record!
Nice to hear but the bottomline today and the kind of shot he played when the whole team depended on him
-
5th October 2010, 12:21 PM
#604
Senior Member
Veteran Hubber
Waterloo, u try for rule change where Sachin gets to play on behalf of entire team. Afterall others dnt get paid and Sachin shud be the only match winner. Nice logic. Can u dig stats and post abt failures of other 6 gentlemen (of the top 7 batsmen) as well please when we are chasing a score to win?
Damager - 30 roovaa da, 30 roovaa kuduththa 3 naaL kaNNu muzhichchu vElai senju 30 pakkam OttuvaNdaa!
-
5th October 2010, 12:33 PM
#605
Moderator
Diamond Hubber
Originally Posted by
19thmay
Originally Posted by
Waterloo
Sachin has failed again !
What happened to your sunnyg, Nakeeran ID's?
Sunnyg is a different guy.
-
5th October 2010, 12:59 PM
#606
Originally Posted by
sathya_1979
Waterloo, u try for rule change where Sachin gets to play on behalf of entire team. Afterall others dnt get paid and Sachin shud be the only match winner. Nice logic. Can u dig stats and post abt failures of other 6 gentlemen (of the top 7 batsmen) as well please when we are chasing a score to win?
Point is that someone with >20 years of experience and going to touch 100 centuries in international cricket , playing such a shot when the team looks at you for winning !
-
5th October 2010, 01:10 PM
#607
Senior Member
Veteran Hubber
Point is it is not the best individual's folly to perform below par once in a while, when he is playing in a TEAM OF 11.
Damager - 30 roovaa da, 30 roovaa kuduththa 3 naaL kaNNu muzhichchu vElai senju 30 pakkam OttuvaNdaa!
-
5th October 2010, 02:27 PM
#608
Senior Member
Platinum Hubber
Originally Posted by
Waterloo
Originally Posted by
Plum
Yes, yes. He should learn from Ponting who played a match winning knock in Aussies second innings in this very match!
Ponting performs as a captain
Hey. Why you are comparing here ?
romba nallA perform paNNaruppA!
-
5th October 2010, 02:32 PM
#609
Senior Member
Platinum Hubber
Nakkeee, romba mukkadhinga. People make mistakes. It's as simple as that.
Originally Posted by
Waterloo
Originally Posted by
sathya_1979
Waterloo, u try for rule change where Sachin gets to play on behalf of entire team. Afterall others dnt get paid and Sachin shud be the only match winner. Nice logic. Can u dig stats and post abt failures of other 6 gentlemen (of the top 7 batsmen) as well please when we are chasing a score to win?
Point is that someone with >20 years of experience and going to touch 100 centuries in international cricket , playing such a shot when the team looks at you for winning !
-
5th October 2010, 04:26 PM
#610
Senior Member
Veteran Hubber
Originally Posted by
Waterloo
Originally Posted by
sathya_1979
Waterloo, u try for rule change where Sachin gets to play on behalf of entire team. Afterall others dnt get paid and Sachin shud be the only match winner. Nice logic. Can u dig stats and post abt failures of other 6 gentlemen (of the top 7 batsmen) as well please when we are chasing a score to win?
Point is that someone with >20 years of experience and going to touch 100 centuries in international cricket , playing such a shot when the team looks at you for winning !
Oh... What will you say when he tries to defend a ball, the ball takes the edge and goes to a fielder?
I don't know why you are all criticizing the shot. That shot was ON. It is not a new shot he is attempting. He can play it well. A slight misjudgement caused his downfall. Mind you, here we were not looking to play for time where he can let everything go by. But here, we had to win by scoring runs and when we were losing wickets at the other end, it was mandatory that he was looking to score runs at a brisk pace.
Bookmarks