-
14th August 2007, 08:12 AM
#1001
Senior Member
Senior Hubber
Originally Posted by
buggle
I
PS:I am not a big YSR fan, but atleast i wont fill up these pages with incorrect information...
You have already done that. Maargazhi poove is'nt an example for devotional remixed song like you said earlier. It uses only a small portion of the original devotional chant as an instrumental piece in the ludes. The tune of that song is totally different and original. It can be called an inspiration at best. Next time get the correct example before you jump in to ridicule someone else
-
14th August 2007 08:12 AM
# ADS
Circuit advertisement
-
14th August 2007, 08:22 AM
#1002
Senior Member
Diamond Hubber
Just a question :
"There is a song in Pithamagan that was quite popular Whenever I think of REMIXES, that comes to my mind. Probably a collection of songs thrown here and there to make a SOUP / MASALA of ALL SONGS. A perfect REMIX !
I think the REMIX KING Yuvan still has not defeated his FATHER IN THIS CASE
Ponnu Vellai tholah? illai Karuppu tholah?
RE: Aennn.. Puli tholu..
Use short words, short sentences and short paragraphs. Never use jargon words like reconceptualize, demassification, attitudinally, judgmentally. They are hallmarks of a pretentious ass. - David Ogilvy
-
14th August 2007, 10:54 AM
#1003
Senior Member
Senior Hubber
Originally Posted by
app_engine
One more - the tune of 'kaNNAl pEsum peNNe, ennai mannippAyA' from mozhi(VS) sounds very similar to 'nee dhAn en dEsiya geetham ranjanA ranjanA' of pArthalE paravasam(ARR)...
While I don't think there's any similarity between the two, Kannaal pesum penne was based on Vidyasagar's own Malayalam song, 'Walking in the moonlight' from the film Satyam Shivam Sundaram (2000). Paarthaale Paravasam came out in 2001
Listen to the Walking in the moonlight, here (last track in both pages)...
http://www.raaga.com/channels/malaya.../M0000654.html
http://www.musicindiaonline.com/musi...director.1296/
Karthik
-
14th August 2007, 04:45 PM
#1004
Senior Member
Veteran Hubber
Originally Posted by
vijayr
It doesnt change the fact, that it is still not an original song. Just the source is different. In fact it is a remix of a partially lifted/inspired song. And remixes technically qualify as lifts or copied songs(even if they are legally approved in which case it just becomes a legal lift). what is funnier is some loser YSR fans thinking that it is perfectly OK to lift and remix devotional songs as long as prior permission is obtained. Time is not far off when they will actually applaud YSR for releasing a fully remixed devotional album (with full prior permission of course). First Kanda naaL mudhalaai, now karpoora naayagiye, next what? Marudhamalai maamaNiye?
Remix can't be original, well it should not be! Looks like some people don't even understand the basics of it and they form their opinions based on their ignorance!
'யுவன் இன்றி ஓரணுவும் அசையாது!'
-
14th August 2007, 05:09 PM
#1005
Senior Member
Veteran Hubber
Originally Posted by
MrJudge
Originally Posted by
vijayr
It doesnt change the fact, that it is still not an original song. Just the source is different. In fact it is a remix of a partially lifted/inspired song. And remixes technically qualify as lifts or copied songs(even if they are legally approved in which case it just becomes a legal lift). what is funnier is some loser YSR fans thinking that it is perfectly OK to lift and remix devotional songs as long as prior permission is obtained. Time is not far off when they will actually applaud YSR for releasing a fully remixed devotional album (with full prior permission of course). First Kanda naaL mudhalaai, now karpoora naayagiye, next what? Marudhamalai maamaNiye?
Remix can't be original, well it
should not be! Looks like some people don't even understand the basics of it and they form their opinions based on their ignorance!
Judge, it seems vijayr won't realize at all
vijayr, YSR is doing remixes, yes. So what dude? Remix is a legal one when it comes with proper permission. If you don't want leave it (even i don't want). That's all.
-
14th August 2007, 08:00 PM
#1006
Senior Member
Senior Hubber
Originally Posted by
MrJudge
Remix can't be original, well it should not be!
Well naatamai, you atleast understood that, good, although it took some time. So there is nothing to feel happy about the fact that your MD leads in remixing. Because musically, it is still copying someone else's hard work and is unoriginal(even if legally it is OK). It makes him more of a remix artist than a MD. That's why I was trying to explain it to you and the other guy(who thought the fact that the song was a legal remix and not a single-line lift somehow puts YSR in a higher pedestal).
-
14th August 2007, 08:26 PM
#1007
Senior Member
Devoted Hubber
Originally Posted by
vijayr
Originally Posted by
MrJudge
Remix can't be original, well it should not be!
Well naatamai, you atleast understood that, good, although it took some time. So there is nothing to feel happy about the fact that your MD leads in remixing. Because musically, it is still copying someone else's hard work and is unoriginal(even if legally it is OK). It makes him more of a remix artist than a MD. That's why I was trying to explain it to you and the other guy(who thought the fact that the song was a legal remix and not a single-line lift somehow puts YSR in a higher pedestal).
Mr.Genius, please read my previous post carefully, i said ARR used suprabhatham tune in the interlude of marghazhi poove, i didn't say it was a total remix...
Thanks for taking your time to correct me, but before doing that try to get the correct source/info...
-
14th August 2007, 09:19 PM
#1008
Senior Member
Platinum Hubber
IMO, remixes / rearrangements should be discussed separate from "copied songs". While both are not originals (and the MD doesn't get any credit in both cases for his output), there is a difference. In the case of remix, he does not get "thiruttupattam" (as he acknowledges the original, buys the right etc. which is like getting a news from Reuters / PTI and publish verbatim in The Hindu, albeit with different font / color / arrangement....and hence legal). In the other case, he gets the esteemed title
Going by the same analogy, brief phrases of well-known stuff like 'alai pAyudhE', 'suprabhAtham', 'vArAyen thOzhi vArAyO', 'sindhu nadhiyin misai' etc can be taken as "quotations"...(pAvam, MD's pizhaichchu pOgattum...they are just acknowledging the great originals like people quoting thirukkuRaL)...
I think we must focus on identifying the 'darling-darling's and 'nAn dhAnE oru pudhukkavidhai's...
-
14th August 2007, 09:34 PM
#1009
Administrator
Platinum Hubber
Never argue with a fool or he will drag you down to his level and beat you at it through sheer experience!
-
14th August 2007, 09:38 PM
#1010
Administrator
Platinum Hubber
Originally Posted by
buggle
.... i said ARR used suprabhatham tune in the interlude of marghazhi poove, ...
for literal copy of suprapaadham, listen to IR's sriranga ranga naadhanin paadham vandhanam seyyadi from Mahanadhi.
Never argue with a fool or he will drag you down to his level and beat you at it through sheer experience!
Bookmarks