Page 3 of 81 FirstFirst 123451353 ... LastLast
Results 21 to 30 of 810

Thread: Rahul Dravid : The Wall

  1. #21
    Senior Member Diamond Hubber VinodKumar's's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Posts
    2,797
    Post Thanks / Like

  2. # ADS
    Circuit advertisement
    Join Date
    Always
    Posts
    Many
     

  3. #22
    Senior Member Diamond Hubber VinodKumar's's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Posts
    2,797
    Post Thanks / Like
    Fascinating not regressive !!!

    Let's get the immediate question out of the way. The return of Rahul Dravid to the ODI scene is not knee-jerk, nor is it regressive. The failures of some of India's young ODI batsmen against testing bowling has been a matter of concern for some time. Dravid is not out of touch with modern cricket; he showed as much in the IPL in South Africa, where the par score had come down by about 20 from the inaugural edition and where batting was not all about plain hitting. It is open to debate as to what this move says about the reserves of talent in India, but Dravid's comeback is every bit a fascinating story.

    He was 34 when dropped, an "old man", a "misfit" in the youngsters' game, a terrible failure in his last few matches (80 runs in the last 10, to be specific). India's ODI team did well without Dravid for long enough to raise questions as to why he was not retiring from limited-overs cricket. For the shorter version of the game was supposed to have changed so much over the last two years as to not have any place for Dravid-like one-dimensional non-big-hitters. Why was he even playing the IPL?

    With 333 ODIs and 10,585 runs to his name, it was not as if Dravid had anything to prove to anybody, although most of his ODI career has been about proving people wrong. But something inside must have told him, "This is not how I go". The thought of that drop would not have consumed Dravid over the last two years, during which he has faced a Test slump and come respectfully out of it, but he sure had some unfinished business left. There were no statements in the press that he wanted to play ODIs one more time, but neither was he going to let an opportunity pass.

    If he chooses to be perverse, Dravid can draw pleasure from the knowledge that after the batting failures in the ICC World Twenty20 the selectors have had to come back to him, discarded when the going was good. Instead he has been practising for about a week now at the NCA in Bangalore, even on a public holiday when the academy was closed, with a white ball. That is how success has come to Dravid: more hard work, less flash.

    In making this comeback, he has also taken a gamble. Playing ODIs again could have an effect on what remains of his Test career. Dravid can easily keep on playing Test cricket, go out on his own terms, and the memories of his struggles against Australia in home ODIs two years ago won't even be evoked. Now he has put on line the relaxed state of mind he attained after giving up captaincy, and playing only Test cricket.

    It is a bold move by the selectors too, because it will be all too easy to criticise if it goes wrong. The seeds for Dravid's comeback perhaps were sown when West Indies first employed the short ball successfully against India in the World Twenty20, only for South Africa and England to take cue and expose their frailties against the bouncer. Virender Sehwag's unavailability must have made the decision easier.

    It is a short-term selection all right, one that as of now doesn't keep the 2011 World Cup in mind; a lot of it anyway depends on how well Dravid does during the tri-series in Sri Lanka and the Champions Trophy. The selectors see him as a bridge for the Rainas and the Rohits, who have the obvious talent, but are yet to graduate to the next level. Rohit Sharma will surely be disappointed, but dejected he shouldn't be. He will know he needs better than four half-centuries in 41 matches to show for the talent he has. Perhaps the selectors also thought that in performing the Dravid-type role, in giving the other big-hitters the license, MS Dhoni might have lost his explosive game a bit.

    Dravid is quite familiar with that "Dravid-like" role. He has batted around the Gangulys, the Sehwags and the Tendulkars all throughout his ODI career. Not much will change for him this time around. It's quite possible that he comes back and finds that ODI cricket has indeed changed drastically, but come Sri Lanka not much will have changed in Dravid's commitment.

  4. #23
    Senior Member Diamond Hubber Nerd's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Posts
    7,811
    Post Thanks / Like
    One of the best decisions by BCCI in the recent years.

  5. #24
    Senior Member Diamond Hubber MADDY's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Posts
    8,893
    Post Thanks / Like
    Quote Originally Posted by Nerd
    One of the best decisions by BCCI in the recent years.
    make it 4 claps

    ah i'm loving it - rohit sharma dropped and dravid taken in.......now the team looks more like mudhalvan arjun team - youngster and experience
    _________
    Rahman's music is the ringtone on God's mobile phone

  6. #25
    Moderator Diamond Hubber littlemaster1982's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    Chennai
    Posts
    9,880
    Post Thanks / Like
    Dravid's selection a golden handshake?

    New Delhi: Rarely has the event of Indian team selection not been succeeded by controversy. The selection of 15 men for the Champions Trophy appears to be no different.

    According to sources, selection of Rahul Dravid in the South Africa bound squad is a compromise between the BCCI and the aging veteran to provide the latter an honourable exit from international cricket.

    Sources say that according to the deal brokered between the Indian cricket board and Dravid, he would bid adieu to one day cricket after the Champions Trophy in South Africa next month.


    Dravid, who is a regular part of India’s Test set-up, last played an ODI for India way back in the October of 2007 in the home series against Australia where he managed just 51 runs from 5 innings.

    Dravid’s re-induction is said to be a consequence of India’s Twenty20 World Cup debacle in June this year where the young turks were seen struggling against the short ball.

    Dravid, it is said, was drafted in to bolster Indian batting in the pacer friendly conditions of South Africa.

    Interestingly, this is not the first time that reports of ‘a golden handshake’ between an aging senior and BCCI have come to the fore.

    Last year, former captain Sourav Ganguly too was reportedly offered a conditional selection into the Indian team for the Test series against Australia provided he hung up his boots after the series.

    Though both the parties had vehemently denied the reports, Ganguly had eventually called it a day after the Australia series.

    _______________


  7. #26
    Moderator Platinum Hubber P_R's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Posts
    10,036
    Post Thanks / Like
    My thoughts same same.
    iththOda anuppiruvaainga.

    Reporters have been advised to not use up their glowing words for 'all the hail the return of' columns now.
    மூவா? முதல்வா! இனியெம்மைச் சோரேலே

  8. #27
    Senior Member Diamond Hubber VinodKumar's's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Posts
    2,797
    Post Thanks / Like
    Quote Originally Posted by littlemaster1982
    Dravid's selection a golden handshake?

    New Delhi: Rarely has the event of Indian team selection not been succeeded by controversy. The selection of 15 men for the Champions Trophy appears to be no different.

    According to sources, selection of Rahul Dravid in the South Africa bound squad is a compromise between the BCCI and the aging veteran to provide the latter an honourable exit from international cricket.

    Sources say that according to the deal brokered between the Indian cricket board and Dravid, he would bid adieu to one day cricket after the Champions Trophy in South Africa next month.


    Dravid, who is a regular part of India’s Test set-up, last played an ODI for India way back in the October of 2007 in the home series against Australia where he managed just 51 runs from 5 innings.

    Dravid’s re-induction is said to be a consequence of India’s Twenty20 World Cup debacle in June this year where the young turks were seen struggling against the short ball.

    Dravid, it is said, was drafted in to bolster Indian batting in the pacer friendly conditions of South Africa.

    Interestingly, this is not the first time that reports of ‘a golden handshake’ between an aging senior and BCCI have come to the fore.

    Last year, former captain Sourav Ganguly too was reportedly offered a conditional selection into the Indian team for the Test series against Australia provided he hung up his boots after the series.

    Though both the parties had vehemently denied the reports, Ganguly had eventually called it a day after the Australia series.

    _______________

    what the hell is happening here ... dravid would not do all these things ... lets see ...

    Rahul please stop playing ckt for this &*&$*&$# BCCI ...

  9. #28
    Senior Member Platinum Hubber
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    basically iyAm nArthiNdian
    Posts
    14,478
    Post Thanks / Like
    I like this. Dhoni no longer has an excuse for playing consolidator.
    Alternatively, if Dhoni insists on being consolidator, there might be CSK type results with Rahul Dravid playing Badrinath in the national setup.

  10. #29
    Moderator Platinum Hubber P_R's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Posts
    10,036
    Post Thanks / Like
    Quote Originally Posted by Plum
    I like this. Dhoni no longer has an excuse for playing consolidator.
    pre-emptive nathanArism
    மூவா? முதல்வா! இனியெம்மைச் சோரேலே

  11. #30
    Senior Member Diamond Hubber directhit's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Posts
    5,848
    Post Thanks / Like
    Till the full stop doesn't come, the sentence is not complete - MSD

Page 3 of 81 FirstFirst 123451353 ... LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. *** Rahul Dravid's Rajasthan Royals - Halla Bol ***
    By Puliyan_Biryani in forum Sports
    Replies: 109
    Last Post: 11th March 2014, 02:10 PM
  2. || ADA | Tanvir Ahmed | Rahul Roy ||
    By thineshan54321 in forum A.R. Rahman (ARR) Albums
    Replies: 368
    Last Post: 1st February 2011, 06:01 PM
  3. The Iraqi Wall Clock.
    By Surya in forum Stories / kathaigaL
    Replies: 136
    Last Post: 15th December 2006, 06:24 AM
  4. Mrs.SoniaGandhiji and Rahul Gandhi email-id
    By bliss in forum Miscellaneous Topics
    Replies: 11
    Last Post: 17th February 2005, 11:08 AM
  5. Should India go for a new wicketkeeper? or continue Dravid
    By iwillbehidden in forum Miscellaneous Topics
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 31st December 2004, 08:24 PM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •