-
17th November 2006, 09:28 PM
#41
Senior Member
Seasoned Hubber
casino royale seems to be very gud..
its rated A- by the critics..
but many users feel very bad but equal number feel very good..
this BOND and plts are more realistic..
looking forward to watch this movie
-
17th November 2006 09:28 PM
# ADS
Circuit advertisement
-
17th November 2006, 10:01 PM
#42
Senior Member
Senior Hubber
what do u think 'bout the actor
-
17th November 2006, 10:33 PM
#43
Senior Member
Seasoned Hubber
Originally Posted by
rayan36
what do u think 'bout the actor
\
he looks like a hench man
clive owen shud have been awesome..
but eva green :P :P :P
-
18th November 2006, 03:53 AM
#44
Senior Member
Veteran Hubber
Originally Posted by
kb
Originally Posted by
rayan36
what do u think 'bout the actor
\
he looks like a hench man
Yeah I don't like him either.....What a waste...Pierce Brosnan was the Best after Shaun Connery!
-
18th November 2006, 11:00 AM
#45
Senior Member
Diamond Hubber
Casino Royale, most disappointing Bond film ever
Joginder Tuteja, IndiaGlitz [Friday, November 17, 2006]
The newest edition of 007 movies, CASINO ROYALE, has turned out to be one of the most disappointing Bond flicks ever.
The film was premiered yesterday at Delhi and it was shocking to witness the slow pace sans any chills and thrills in this 'Birth-of-Bond' movie. There are just about 3-4 notable scenes in the film and that includes a couple of excellently orchestrated action sequences in the first 45 minutes of the film, followed by a scene or two at the casino table.
Apart from this, the film tries to rely heavily on emotional moments, hence trying to show the softer side of James Bond. But in an attempt to do so, it deviates from the vintage Bond following that it has cultivated over the decades.
Things slow down considerably in the pre-climax and the story seems to be moving towards an abrupt end. Though the climax gets your attention back in for a couple of minutes, it doesn't really come with a kind of shock value. In fact, one has now got used to such twists in numerous Hollywood/Bollywood films over the last few years. A below average climax action sequence which follows, only adds on to the boredom further.
Also missing is the tongue-in-cheek humour which is normally associated with every Bond movie. Here the witty dialogues are few and far-between and there is hardly a chance for Bond to showcase his naughty side.
Daniel Craig is fine as an actor but comparisons with Sean Connery and even Pierce Brosnan are inevitable. Craig does well but the loyal followers of Connery and Brosnan would be ready with their daggers out, once the film is screened across the world.
I learned long ago, never to wrestle with a pig. You get dirty, and besides, the pig likes it.
- Bernard Shaw
-
18th November 2006, 07:27 PM
#46
Senior Member
Veteran Hubber
For the first time indiaglitz has given negative review
-
18th November 2006, 10:24 PM
#47
Senior Member
Seasoned Hubber
Originally Posted by
great
For the first time indiaglitz has given negative review
coz its not selling tickets for that movie
-
18th November 2006, 10:51 PM
#48
Senior Member
Veteran Hubber
Originally Posted by
kb
Originally Posted by
great
For the first time indiaglitz has given negative review
coz its not selling tickets for that movie
-
19th November 2006, 12:36 AM
#49
Senior Member
Veteran Hubber
-
19th November 2006, 12:41 AM
#50
Senior Member
Veteran Hubber
Hey this movie seems to good !! Even i didnt like Daniel Craig as 007 but this movie seems to be different not usuall James Bond movie. There is no regular intro music heard daniel use the dialogue Bond , James Bond only once that too in the climax.
Bookmarks