-
14th February 2006, 09:38 PM
#21
Junior Member
Admin HubberNewbie HubberTeam HubberModerator HubberPro Hubber
Originally Posted by
indian224080
Hey FSG,
One personal question. Whats ur nationality?
But one thing i and others would be happy about FSG posting is the One-India (a Greater Tamilnadu extending from Kashmir to Kanyakumari and from Gujarat to Assam.) policy he maintains. This clearly refutes the fact (some tamil supremos's) that there was never a One-India before british rule.
Indian twotwofourzeroeightzero, what is yours? You are not even a Tamil! Is there a sanskrit nationality?
-
14th February 2006 09:38 PM
# ADS
Circuit advertisement
-
21st February 2006, 03:54 AM
#22
Junior Member
Admin HubberNewbie HubberTeam HubberModerator HubberPro Hubber
What a biased thought!
It is height of ignorance or hieght of " "! Sorry I dont have words to comment this. Mr. Vandayaar, I see nothing short of hatred in your thread. You can even interprt "America" to be based on a Tamizh word! Keep it up!
-
23rd February 2006, 12:37 AM
#23
Senior Member
Regular Hubber
So what about Dwarka's ruins ??
Gujarat is not South India.
-
23rd February 2006, 12:40 AM
#24
Senior Member
Regular Hubber
But what is sure about Mahabharatha is that South Indians can be identified as beeing the Pandavas.
-
5th March 2006, 10:01 PM
#25
Junior Member
Admin HubberNewbie HubberTeam HubberModerator HubberPro Hubber
-
5th March 2006, 10:41 PM
#26
Senior Member
Regular Hubber
well i have heard that ....keeping a MAHABHARATAM BOOK AT HOME COULD CREATE FAMILY PROBLEMS ?
i dint say it .
i heard it
-
6th March 2006, 04:17 PM
#27
Senior Member
Devoted Hubber
MAHABHARATAM
Friendsm
we need to look at One India, and we have Tamil Sangam Literature which confirms the great Vedic And Epic Traditions.
Archealogy confirms from Dwaraka and other places.
Tamil Pandya King arranged for TRanslation of Mahabaratha to Tamil in BCE 200 AS per Velvikudi Copper Plates.
Devapriya.
-
24th March 2006, 11:56 PM
#28
Senior Member
Devoted Hubber
Re: MAHABHARATAM
Originally Posted by
devapriya
Friendsm
we need to look at One India, and we have Tamil Sangam Literature which confirms the great Vedic And Epic Traditions.
Archealogy confirms from Dwaraka and other places.
Tamil Pandya King arranged for TRanslation of Mahabaratha to Tamil in BCE 200 AS per Velvikudi Copper Plates.
Devapriya.
The timeline of ‘VELVIKUDI CHEPPEDU' is (710-775 CE) and not any BCE. Pallava King Nanthivarman II-Army Head Udayachandran was defeated by Pandian from the place Neduvarai to Kuzhumur – 7 villages. This is the message from this Cheppedu.
Refer -Pandian Nedunchadayan Paranthakan Velvikudi Cheppedukal by T.V. Sadasiva Pandaraththar, Pandiyar Varalaru, Page 3-4.
Solomon Devapriya Continue your lies,misinterpretations and selective quotings. Perhaps ‘Velvi’ tempted your Archaka mind. It is tamil Velvi and not artificial sanskrit Yaham where you may be given job.
Mahabharatham was copied from tamil and rewritten with imaginative stories in Sanskrit. Wait for my future postings containing such kind of copied versions in Sanskrit from all arts of tamils.
f.s.gandhi
"Kal thonri man thontra kalathay mun thonri mootha kudi"- a second century literature- means when before stone became sand in earth the tamil tribes were formulated
-
26th March 2006, 10:07 PM
#29
Member
Junior Hubber
Mahabharatha was written by Sri Vyasadeva(who is known as Badarayana, KrshnaDwaipayana and Veda Vyasa). This is older than any dravidian works known to date.
-
31st March 2006, 12:15 AM
#30
Senior Member
Devoted Hubber
Dear Shoyonika,
You seems to be in imaginative world doing preachings as Rishis do. I have observed this from your postings. Visit old postings in this forum.
You cannot claim the Antiquity of Sanskrit without mentioning the timeline.
Good luck next time.
f.s.gandhi
"Kal thonri man thontra kalathay mun thonri mootha kudi"- a second century literature- means when before stone became sand in earth the tamil tribes were formulated
Bookmarks