Vedic Past of Pre-Islamic Arabia

[bis_mala]

Dravidians, the masters of everything they surveyed all over the subcontinent.

Aryans -- myth!!

Sans - 2/3 Dravidian. (lexical base) with Munda etc.
Sans - sound system - entirely Dravida origin.
Sans - made by Dravidians as prayer compo. 1/3 may be Iranian and outside languages.

[devapriya]

Dear Friends,

Our Ex.President a great Philosopher has written many books which are rated for its highest standards. wherein he traces Hinduism base on NewTestament fully.

Tamil has 1/3 words burrowed from Sanskrit.
Half that from Prakrit and Pali.

Where as your Lies are from improper Linguists.

I have given links to Sites which replied the latest Researches that many words claimed by Tamil Lexicon by Burrows as Dravidian as Sanskrit only by Proper Grammer.

So post here about Arab and not mear Lies.

Devapriya.

[bis_mala]

Dear Friends,

Tamil has 1/3 words burrowed from Sanskrit.
Half that from Prakrit and Pali.

Where as your Lies are from improper Linguists.

I have given links to Sites which replied the latest Researches that many words claimed by Tamil Lexicon by Burrows as Dravidian as Sanskrit only by Proper Grammer.

So post here about Arab and not mear Lies.

Devapriya.

There is nothing to borrow from Sanskrit which is a language of prayer composition. Sanskrit was refined from the various Prakrits. Please be mindful of the fact grammar rules can become obsolete and that does not mean Sanskrit can help itself and covet all those words framed subsequently. So if your son's feet have become bigger and cannot wear his old shoes, your neighbour can claim the shoes as his - can he? Grammar is just a collection of rules elicited from the usage of the time. Language: the feet. Grammar: shoes for those feet at the time. Understand that.

[mahadevan]

sanskrit is a man made language that took vocabulary and grammer from the existing langauges (mostly from Tamil). It was perfected, god only knows what is meant by this, it is complex yet does not convey anything precisely. Any language that cannot qualify for the very basic of communication (clarity) is not even worthy of being called a language. Srivatsan now do not jump, this lack of clarity is often cited by all vedic translators as the reason for not yet knowing the real (so call hidden)meaning of vedic lit. If you differ and really belive in your knowledge of sanskrit, why dont you start a seperate thread and do your translation of Rig in english with the correct meaning, so that we all can cherish the so called vedic knowledge. Please do not write bs like solomon/his other avatars, I am expecting a scholarly work from you !

[devapriya]

Friends,

Semitic Languages are the branches of SAANSKRIT, Which I HAVE GIVEN WITH Proof quotes of Secret Doctrine of Theosophical Society.

Prakrit are branches of Vedic Sanskrit as Classical Sanskrit.

If your attacking of CLASSICAL Sanskrit is never spoken, never was Classical Tamil spoken, as we see the Colloquial language mised with Sanskrit and Prakrits in most of the Stone Insceiptions.

As for roots of words, I have given links which have proved that Pro.Burrows who claimed many Sanskrit words as Tamil are proved wrong, in respecrtive threads.

Every Language is Man made and if Sanskrit is artificial also is Tamil.

Let us concentrate on Arab here.

Devapriya.

[bis_mala]

Semitic Languages are the branches of SAANSKRIT, Which I HAVE GIVEN WITH Proof quotes of Secret Doctrine of Theosophical Society.

If they are sure, why should they hide it as secret?

Prakrit are branches of Vedic Sanskrit as Classical Sanskrit.

Prakrits: roots.
Sanskrit: the leaves.
Roots are not branches of leaves.

If your attacking of CLASSICAL Sanskrit is never spoken,

Stating a fact is not attacking, isn't it?

never was Classical Tamil spoken, as we see the Colloquial language mised with Sanskrit and Prakrits in most of the Stone Insceiptions.

Please do not close your eyes and claim darkness around you!!

As for roots of words, I have given links which have proved that Pro.Burrows who claimed many Sanskrit words as Tamil are proved wrong, in respecrtive threads.

Prof Burrows left out many. Lahovery found them all. 2/3 borrowed by sans

if Sanskrit is artificial also is Tamil.

How absurd! If your lips are lipstick-red, another girl's lips may be natural red. Your lips are yours; her lips are hers; no connexion.