View Poll Results: What makes VIJAY 58, an exciting prospect?

Voters
30. You may not vote on this poll
  • GENRE: Vijay's first Fantasy Entertainer

    20 66.67%
  • CAST: Presence of names such as Sridevi, Sudeep and Sruthi Haasan

    3 10.00%
  • DIRECTOR: Chimbudevan, an off-beat director on-board

    5 16.67%
  • REACH: Vijay's first movie made in more than one language

    2 6.67%
Page 117 of 296 FirstFirst ... 1767107115116117118119127167217 ... LastLast
Results 1,161 to 1,170 of 2956

Thread: PULI - Ilayathalapathy VIJAY| Sruthi Haasan | Sudeep | Chimbudevan | DSP |

  1. #1161
    Senior Member Seasoned Hubber Deepak7's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2011
    Posts
    1,566
    Post Thanks / Like
    Quote Originally Posted by PR218 View Post
    CGI looked good but songs horrible.
    Seems unga expectation ku Indian cinemavelei yarrum ithuvaraikum padam yeduthathilla so neenga better Hollywood Korean Japanese movies paakalaam

  2. # ADS
    Circuit advertisement
    Join Date
    Always
    Posts
    Many
     

  3. #1162
    Senior Member Seasoned Hubber Deepak7's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2011
    Posts
    1,566
    Post Thanks / Like
    82k likes in just 4 days ...I think this s so unexpected response so they should enhance the cgi works as much as possible and get rid off unnecessary scenes may be one song also to keep the movie racy....

  4. #1163
    Senior Member Seasoned Hubber Deepak7's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2011
    Posts
    1,566
    Post Thanks / Like

  5. #1164
    Senior Member Senior Hubber Muthalvan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2013
    Posts
    750
    Post Thanks / Like
    Quote Originally Posted by PR218 View Post
    puli blue lens pottu irukkaratha paatha namakku kannla irunthu thanni varuthu

    but trailer seemed ok, was expecting a disaster but kinda felt ok. CGI looked good but songs horrible.
    Aiyoo Paaavam

  6. #1165
    Senior Member Seasoned Hubber Deepak7's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2011
    Posts
    1,566
    Post Thanks / Like

  7. #1166
    Senior Member Regular Hubber Mukzi's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    Cmb
    Posts
    127
    Post Thanks / Like
    A Thumb Down to Hindustan Times & Its writer Nivedita Mishra

    Nivedita Mishra is a writer from Hindustan Times. She wrote her feedback on Puli's teaser and then again on the trailer released few days ago. We don't have anything personal against the writer but we thought to write our reply to what she has written. The post will be a part from the article and our reply to that particular part.

    First thing the writer knows the word fantasy but looks like she is mixing between fantasy and historical. That is the First Mistake. Fantasy is completely different than historical. Definition of fantasy is imagination especially when extravagant and unrestrained.
    And how does Fantasy genre in films defined? it is something that contains rudiments that are not realistic, such as magical powers, talking animals, etc. Fantasy is often characterized by a departure from the accepted rules by which individuals perceive the world around them; it represents that which is impossible (unexplained) and outside the parameters of our known, reality. Make-believe is what this genre is all about. A fantasy has no language, land or look.

    Second Mistake: The writer maybe have not watched enough movies. Nivedita ji haven't you seen Hollywood produced films like Aladdin or Sinbad? These and many other films were loved by audience and critics & we have not seen Hollywood critics say that Sinbad was not white or blue eyed! they did not say that western people should not wear these clothes! Why? because their critics know the meaning of the word fantasy and you don't. See the below picture. This is Sinbad! White with blue eyes!

    Why go to Hollywood. Have you seen Bollywood films? Haven't you seen films like Alibaba Aur 40 Chor? Ajooba or even Dharmendra's Superman? Do you think Indians should not make movies that has a bit of Persian/Arab culture or Western look? A fantasy film has no land, no language. A fantasy film can happen anywhere. Puli is no different here.

    Third Mistake: Writer has assumed that Puli is taking place in India! This is not true, Puli is not taking place in India simply because it is a fantasy film. Just because the film is made in India does not necessarily mean it takes place there. Names, places and everything about the movie is completely fictional. That is what a fantasy is about.

    Fourth Mistake: The writer keeps repeating herself again and again. Her problem is that the look of the film is western and the film is an Indian one! Did you see films like Vikram Bhatt's 1920? Did India look like that or Indian wear like that in the 1920s? Did you watch Sanjay Leela Bhansali's Guzaarish? Where was the setting of the film? Do Indians wear like that? bearing in mind that both these films were not even fantasies! One was a horror film and the other was more a romantic drama.

    Fifth Mistake: Why does Puli have to be Baahubali? These are two different films with two different genres! How can you compare the two? Other than both being made with high budget and with lots of CGI use there is no other similarity! Actually we are glad that Puli is so different. Kudos to the makers for making it very different. The writer wants every movie to look the same to her own taste, That is not going to happen.
    For all the above the writer gets a thumb down from us and Hindustan Times also gets another thumb down for posting this article not once but twice.

    Our advise to the respected writer Nivedita Mishra is to grab a dictionary and learn the correct meaning of the word Fantasy!

    - See more at: http://www.sridevi.biz/1/post/2015/0....DkQ35kBT.dpuf
    If she is not the one,Being Single is Aweosme!!

  8. #1167
    Senior Member Veteran Hubber
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Posts
    3,071
    Post Thanks / Like
    Quote Originally Posted by Mukzi View Post
    A Thumb Down to Hindustan Times & Its writer Nivedita Mishra

    Nivedita Mishra is a writer from Hindustan Times. She wrote her feedback on Puli's teaser and then again on the trailer released few days ago. We don't have anything personal against the writer but we thought to write our reply to what she has written. The post will be a part from the article and our reply to that particular part.

    First thing the writer knows the word fantasy but looks like she is mixing between fantasy and historical. That is the First Mistake. Fantasy is completely different than historical. Definition of fantasy is imagination especially when extravagant and unrestrained.
    And how does Fantasy genre in films defined? it is something that contains rudiments that are not realistic, such as magical powers, talking animals, etc. Fantasy is often characterized by a departure from the accepted rules by which individuals perceive the world around them; it represents that which is impossible (unexplained) and outside the parameters of our known, reality. Make-believe is what this genre is all about. A fantasy has no language, land or look.

    Second Mistake: The writer maybe have not watched enough movies. Nivedita ji haven't you seen Hollywood produced films like Aladdin or Sinbad? These and many other films were loved by audience and critics & we have not seen Hollywood critics say that Sinbad was not white or blue eyed! they did not say that western people should not wear these clothes! Why? because their critics know the meaning of the word fantasy and you don't. See the below picture. This is Sinbad! White with blue eyes!

    Why go to Hollywood. Have you seen Bollywood films? Haven't you seen films like Alibaba Aur 40 Chor? Ajooba or even Dharmendra's Superman? Do you think Indians should not make movies that has a bit of Persian/Arab culture or Western look? A fantasy film has no land, no language. A fantasy film can happen anywhere. Puli is no different here.

    Third Mistake: Writer has assumed that Puli is taking place in India! This is not true, Puli is not taking place in India simply because it is a fantasy film. Just because the film is made in India does not necessarily mean it takes place there. Names, places and everything about the movie is completely fictional. That is what a fantasy is about.

    Fourth Mistake: The writer keeps repeating herself again and again. Her problem is that the look of the film is western and the film is an Indian one! Did you see films like Vikram Bhatt's 1920? Did India look like that or Indian wear like that in the 1920s? Did you watch Sanjay Leela Bhansali's Guzaarish? Where was the setting of the film? Do Indians wear like that? bearing in mind that both these films were not even fantasies! One was a horror film and the other was more a romantic drama.

    Fifth Mistake: Why does Puli have to be Baahubali? These are two different films with two different genres! How can you compare the two? Other than both being made with high budget and with lots of CGI use there is no other similarity! Actually we are glad that Puli is so different. Kudos to the makers for making it very different. The writer wants every movie to look the same to her own taste, That is not going to happen.
    For all the above the writer gets a thumb down from us and Hindustan Times also gets another thumb down for posting this article not once but twice.

    Our advise to the respected writer Nivedita Mishra is to grab a dictionary and learn the correct meaning of the word Fantasy!

    - See more at: http://www.sridevi.biz/1/post/2015/0....DkQ35kBT.dpuf
    ***Our advise to the respected writer Nivedita Mishra is to grab a dictionary and learn the correct meaning of the word Fantasy!***

    My advice to this author is learn how to spell the noun, "Advice"!
    This is a very big world!

  9. #1168
    Senior Member Seasoned Hubber Deepak7's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2011
    Posts
    1,566
    Post Thanks / Like
    Fan made poster

  10. #1169
    Senior Member Seasoned Hubber Deepak7's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2011
    Posts
    1,566
    Post Thanks / Like
    Guys thalaivar padathuku eppavumei oru jing cha kootam korasolurathu ku irukum..thuppaki,kaththi ella padathukum ippadithaan kora sonaanga kadasila result appo kaanapoiyuduvanga so don't listen to them

  11. Likes Mukzi liked this post
  12. #1170
    Senior Member Devoted Hubber
    Join Date
    Dec 2014
    Posts
    319
    Post Thanks / Like
    Quote Originally Posted by VinodKumar's View Post
    Wanted to be a disaster nu unmaiyavae sollunga onnum solla mataanga ... kondaiya maraingaiya !!! Evalo naalaiku vesathulayae vazhvinga !!!
    enna kondai mandainnu kittu.. edhukai monaiya pesrennku edhavadhu thappa pesa poren pathukonga.. innum antha impersonation episode mudiyala?

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •