Page 1 of 22 12311 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 214

Thread: Ex-Number One England

  1. #1
    Senior Member Platinum Hubber
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    basically iyAm nArthiNdian
    Posts
    14,478
    Post Thanks / Like

    Ex-Number One England

    Quote Originally Posted by P_R View Post
    The way BAirstow was playing I hope they summon the guts to not call KP for some more time.
    pArppOm.


    Strauss-Cook-Trott : one of these Always fired in the 2 years. Let down.
    What's with edging the new ball every single time
    Philander was doing nothing great but was always getting wickets, it wasn't funny.

    I still maintain Broad or Anderson, in flow, are far better bowlers than this Morkali and philander. But they were so so ordinary while these guys induced so many mistakes. ONNumE puriyalE ulagathilE.

    Overall this series was not the 'fast bowling treat' I expected. Not saying this because England lost.

    Exactly same excuse being given by BritishvaaLs in Guardian. Feeyaar is a born britisher by temparament

    Rob Smyth in Guardian - Well done thennAppirikkA but idhuvE kaNdi pOna varusham vandhirundhIngannA nAnga dhAn jeyichiruppOm. ippO enga pasanga konjam asandhuttAnga.

    KP zero adichadukku Karma apdinnu article pOttAn indha payal. ippO England thOthadhu enna KurmavA appO?

  2. # ADS
    Circuit advertisement
    Join Date
    Always
    Location
    Advertising world
    Posts
    Many
     

  3. #2
    Senior Member Platinum Hubber
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    basically iyAm nArthiNdian
    Posts
    14,478
    Post Thanks / Like
    This excuse about this series being lost because England under performed is nonsense. When the pressure was on, they coyuldnt deliver.

    It is alright thrashing Dhoni and friends in England and a totally gone Australia. This was your first real test and you failed it. DONT GIVE EXCUSES.
    Infact, it was England which took wickets with loose deliveries in this series most. Without that it would have been a thrashing.

    This last day chase was a flukey boy in burning deck effort - and god knows Britian have a lot of that even in War history. Dont over hype even in loss.

    SA were better. Repeat after me. England were shown their rightful place. Arguably longer than one year #1AmAm. Nonsense. SA have always been the rightful owners int he last few years barring their choking. England are pretenders and they were exposed finally.

    A thrashing of Test bunnies Dhoni and co in India will not change this fact.

  4. #3
    Senior Member Platinum Hubber
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    basically iyAm nArthiNdian
    Posts
    14,478
    Post Thanks / Like
    Now that Bairstow has done it, the disgusting ganging up on Pietersen continues in a shameful way in British press.

    idhai elLAm support paNdravanga piRkAlathula consience attacklayE nimmadhi izhappAnga avLO dhAn splla mudiyin...

  5. #4
    Moderator Platinum Hubber P_R's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Posts
    10,036
    Post Thanks / Like
    Plum, naan sonnadhula enna excuse?
    I unreservedly say SA was the better team.
    England's bowling was thoroughly unimpressive.
    Although SA bowled better, there were no 'wow' moments/bowlers.

    Wizzy, philander was better in his debut series versus Aus. Movement, setting up batsmen etc. Here he didnt do much but England were treating him with too much respect methinks. They got out to many nothing balls.
    மூவா? முதல்வா! இனியெம்மைச் சோரேலே

  6. #5
    Moderator Platinum Hubber P_R's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Posts
    10,036
    Post Thanks / Like
    Ashes.
    End of argument.
    மூவா? முதல்வா! இனியெம்மைச் சோரேலே

  7. #6
    Senior Member Platinum Hubber
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    basically iyAm nArthiNdian
    Posts
    14,478
    Post Thanks / Like
    SA never win 3-0 3-1 etc. But they have a solid team with excellent test players. Wow momentslAm nonsense. apdiyE Ashesla enna wow moments? Cook and Trott blade gauging. adhai vida Amla-Kallis mattamO? summA pEsaNumEnnu pEsa koodAdhu.

    oru seththa pAmbu Australiava adichuttu Enna aattam pOttInga?

  8. #7
    Moderator Platinum Hubber P_R's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Posts
    10,036
    Post Thanks / Like
    Would that 'dead snake' Aus have been beaten by that comprehensively by the best any team (India, SA - rendaiyum mixing kooda paNNikkunga)? If your answer is 'yes' then

    Anyway, England deserved to lose this series. They were well below par. Idhil iru vERu karuththukku idam illai.
    மூவா? முதல்வா! இனியெம்மைச் சோரேலே

  9. #8
    Moderator Platinum Hubber P_R's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Posts
    10,036
    Post Thanks / Like
    Strauss and cook were examples of ppl who were giving him too much respect. I hope someone like Sehwag cuts him down to size. He is consistent, that's the best that can be said about him. Quite unimaginative, hardly troubling pace, nothing impressive in variation. Even the worst detractors of Anderson/Broad wouldnt say this about them - although they'd be justified in saying it after watching this tour
    மூவா? முதல்வா! இனியெம்மைச் சோரேலே

  10. #9
    Senior Member Platinum Hubber
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    basically iyAm nArthiNdian
    Posts
    14,478
    Post Thanks / Like
    Whats your point? India dont even beat Banglandesh or4 Zimbabwe 4-0. Series whitewashlAm nAnga kanavula kooda yosikka mAttOm

    England have the ability to cash in in when the opponent caves in like India and Australia did. adhai oru perumiayA mathavan paNNuvANAnnA?

    You needed the opposition to cave in and not try - in those circumstances you can sure win 3-1. What is so great about that? Why is that a differentiating factor?

    What were the wow moments about England? any ball of the century?

    Yov nIngalum adhe Off stump line Pottu dhAnyA mEla vandhInga!

    Why these excuses now? That England lost only because Anderson and Broad underperformed? Who made them underperform? WHy did they underperform? Because the opposition wasnt India or a 21st century australia who have forgotten their battling roots.

    Why cant you comprehensively accept that England were never the dope that they were claimed to be? Even after comprehensive defeat. Why try to act as if a year ago they would have beaten this SA.

    Then I would say the India of 2010 with Latchu and Sach in great form would have beaten England in England and Oz in Oz. idhellAm summA manasa thEthikka soliiKARadhu

    Accept that yiur team wasnt al that you thought it was even in retrospect/ Tone donw your ATG appraisals of Broad etc. This is their level.

  11. #10
    Senior Member Platinum Hubber
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    basically iyAm nArthiNdian
    Posts
    14,478
    Post Thanks / Like
    If India succumb to pressure under accurate bowling, adh bowlers graetness
    If England does, England gave it away ilavasa vEtti to South Africa

    Nonsense and you know it feeyaar

Page 1 of 22 12311 ... LastLast

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •